About Me

Name: RacKoons
Location: Long Beach, CA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Ca. if no longer golden. Is this USA far behind Ca.'s fate?

 When I was a kid, Al Jolson made a comeback. He sang, 'California , Here I come.' In 1962, I came to the Golden State from Fla., NJ and Philly in that order! I saw a picture of palm trees, beaches and the Beach Boys in a recruiter's memo for hiring teachers.  I made in my first year, $5,400 with an MA in history. I had taught in Md. and Fla. for lesser monies. But, Ca. was the future, the golden state. If one had taken education, major courses that went through the community college levels, one could be sure that Ca. requirements met all of the 49 other states. I had that. I looked at Goodie Knight, other pols out here as enlightened. We had Pat Brown and his son Jerry too. We had Ronaldus Magnus. Even Nelson Rockefeller a notorious liberal said only Reagan understood real welfare, education, and other reforms. Ca. had a balanced budget; by law by the way. But, now Ca. is complicit in everything that is wrong with socialist welfare states that even given legal rights to illegals. The voters keep electing Dems that keep spending and taxing and when we got rid of Gray Davis, we got Arnold who told us he would go back to really balancing the budget without raising taxes. He gave in quickly to liberal Dem plans. Now we are the highest taxed state. We have over 11 %  unemployment. Illegals flood the state hurting our border protection, straining our health care, public education, public safety, and welfare plans for the state. Obama will now try to make a play to BAIL OUT CA. Now, yesterday, when asked by Senator Johanns of Neb.,where, how, why our Constitution did not give Sec. of Treasury or the Admin. legal rights to bail out anyone, take over car or bank corporation, Timmy the tax cheater could not give an answer. There is none. Now, we expect Ca. Dem legislators, who got us into this mess, to ask for a bail out. In fact, the online LA Times says it has already been asked. George Will has had two great columns on this fiasco. Dan Walters of the Sac. Bee has some good insights on this. The voters keep passing bills that would make the state solvent or keep our heritage clean and clear. The State courts keep declaring voter preferences, UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Can you imagine that either the federal 9th Circuit, the most overturned federal lower court to have decisions overturned or some liberal judge continuing to overturn the wishes of your state's voters?? We have experienced that for 40 plus years. Now, Obama will somehow convince the lemmings that vote for him and Dems that he has the right and power to take over Ca. What happens if NY voters do the same to tax hikes that just happened when 5 props in Ca. were turned down? Will BHO take over NY too. And just where does the Constitution give him or Treasury such a right? So cuts for programs will occur unless Obama saves both states. Education, welfare, yep and even border security from the state. Well, what about cuts for all the programs that give Illegals rights they do not deserve and monies, and entrances into schools, hospitals and who knows what? The Left will scream. Gays, feminists, unions, minorities will all wail. I hope the cuts do hurt. I hope that not one tax hike is ever approved again in any of our 50 states. I want to see cuts in every program that gives stuff to people who are not productive. I have worked since I was 12 years old. God has blessed me with jobs to keep my family going and I appreciate it. No pol has ever given me freedom. Except Ronaldus Magnus and that was because he rebuilt the military from the Carter horror years. I want to see Ca. cut it all and tell the pols, no more taxes and stop passing legislation which is just pork, payback to its unions, lobbying groups. Walters and Will have written of this. I hope the dumbed down lemmings who keep electing Dems see those columns.  And I want someone to challenge the Constitutional right of anyone who says he can take over a company, fire CEO's, and bail out states. Doesn't anyone remember the 10th Amendment anymore?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (18) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Mother of all wars

  Of course, we say Happy Mom's Day today. It surely makes some moms happy and HallMark happier. I remember when a few short years ago, Saddam called the upcoming American invasion, the mother of all wars and promptly got kicked in the head.  But over the last few weeks, if anyone was reading the Jerusalem Post and yesterday's Charles Krauhthamer's article on The Hamas Peace Gambit, one can see that perhaps the Mother of all Wars is just in the offing. Now, many theologians use this kind of discussion about Armegeddon.  I do not want to cite dates, prophecy but real time commentary. Over these last 3 months, it seems as if our Administration, does not want to fulfill its secret treaty obligations to protect Israel from nuclear war. In fact, some writers are saying that Rahm , Obama and Hil have told BIBI that unless the Israelis give up all nuclear pretences, that they will not come to their aid. And in fact, that blackmailing the Israelis to also accept a Hamas-PAL-Hez. takeover of areas near and in Jerusalem will also be part of the deal protecting Israel.Then Charles Krauthamer wrote the recent article on The Hamas Peace Gambit. The Hamas Peace Plan supposedly goes for 10 years whereby millions of Muslims go into former Israeli lands. It is a two-state solution and then the truce ends. Of course with Israel weakended, the Islamofascists then can drive them right into the sea as in 1948, the Arab Legion and League both averred. Nothing has changed after all the wars, after the Sadat-Carter years , after the Clinton give aways and monies to the PALS which Bush also followed in remunerations. That was madness there. This peace is the peace of the grave. The USA under the faux Messiah makes overtures to Iran, Syria, and any other Muslim states which has harbored ill will toward the USA and hatred toward Israel. Now, the USA is demanding that Israel give up Golan, all lands near and in Jerusalem all for an illusive promised peace by murderous Islamofascists whose word could never  be trusted even in the days before and after WWII. Even in WWII, most of the Muslim states were pro-Fascist even though not officially. Perhaps Morocco was an exception. Israel under Labor have offered peace in a two-state solution with real protection and every Arab and Islamo dictator has turned it down. No counter offers just more bombings, killing of innocents and kids and murders. A fine group of partners huh? As Arab lands would get closer, rockets would easily hit all Israeli targets. And oh , did I mention that BHO wants to shake the Iranian thug's hand too. And if Israel makes any moves against Iran, America must know in advance and if Israel does do it, oh my what retalitation might occur, from Israel's supposed friend, not Iran!!! So called moderate Muslim states as Egypt and Jordan could never trust a two-state solution because the Islamofascist murderous parties would then take on them and try to kill their leaders as they have often done before. Jordan's leadership has survived over the last 50 years over 20 plus asassination attempts. Olmert and Ehud Barrack often offered two-state solutions only to see the Arab Muslims renig on any promises and why not? They looked at the 1947 UN decision and said in their black-hearts, we will never accept Israel's survival. That the US and Europe and other states cannot see this is very callous and disturbing. Reagan, Nixon, and even Bush understood. Obama does not. Arafat waited 7 years to kill more Israelis. The Hamas gambit is to wait 10 years and then the Mother of All Wars. And that friends could be Armegeddon or something else. And Obama and the USA would have initiated it with their mollycoddling of Islamofascists like Iran and Hamas.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Lab for liberalism

  First, Constitutionally, where do the Feds have the right to take over banks and corporations and even take their stocks and become shareholders? Well, from the past, there have been people and parties and even professors who called for this to happen. Some liberals like Charles Beard suggested this years ago so that supposed 'evil' banks, railroads, corporations should be punished by the Feds and disbanding or using bankruptcy was in the cards. People like Upton Sinclair, Henry A. Wallace, Keynes, and people in the Kitchen Cabinet of the FDR Administrations debates such tactics. Long ago, Teddy Roosevelt wanted to reign in the corporations who took over many businesses thus keeping other entrepreneurs out of the game. But, now we have states and the Feds acting as if there is not division between the branches of government or division between public and private enterprise. Second, George Will recently wrote an article to say that certain states like Ca. are labs for liberalism. Well, George, that is correct but I also remember years ago Soapy Williams in Michigan. He too acted as if the state had a right to reign in businesses if they did not like their profits. Michigan for generations has slowly penalized the car companies and given the UAW, and before that the AFL-CIO more rights and power. Williams bankrupted the state of Michigan, ala the years it has gone through now under the guv and Stebenow. Yet, the public there keeps electing the same old socialist Dems who tax them out of their gourds. Well, Will says that Ca. now is the greatest lab for failed liberalism. Look what Arnold and the Dems have done. Oh, and since I live here, I can say, I tried lobbying for the Chamber in Sacramento and ran into Dems and Pubs who acted as if business was important but soon found that getting votes from minorities, penalizing profits, driving out corporations with taxes, allowing illegals to flood our infrastructure, all were more important than a healthy economy where all peoples could climb into the middle and upper middle classes.  Will points out that for 4 years, more people have left Ca. than came in. We now have 11 % unemployment yet the Dems keep raising the living wage and then tax the hell out of small business so they can't hire anyone.  Then too, there are the enviro whack jobs who keep Ca. from getting the oil and natural gas that floods the areas! And of course, SF will not allow Ca. to build any nuclear plants. If this sounds a bit familiar, it is because this is where we are nationally. Since Ca. sets the trends for the nation, what a horror for a future we are going to have nationally if the socialist pacifists continue to set the agenda. As in Ca., the public still elects the same old liberals and gets the same old results and then whines. Yipe. Well, on May 19, I am voting No on all the supposed tax fixes that the Leg. and Arnold have put forward. Let Sacramento suffer for more months as they try to balance the budget as our state Constitution demands. And if they raise more taxes, I hope the ghost of Jarvis arises out of the ground and devours them all!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (23) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »